Most AI discussions focus on capability.
Very few
focus on control.
That imbalance is dangerous.
When Autonomous Systems Start Making Decisions
Agentic
AI systems can:
- Trigger actions
- Modify workflows
- Interact with customers
- Influence financial outcomes
At scale,
even small misalignments can compound rapidly.
This is
what I refer to as Agent Anarchy:
When
autonomous agents pursue goals correctly—but not appropriately.
The New Risk Landscape
Agentic
systems introduce risks that traditional AI never had to confront:
- Goal drift
- Conflicting agent objectives
- Unintended cascading actions
- Accountability gaps
- Ethical blind spots
Unlike
GenAI hallucinations, these risks are operational, not cosmetic.
Why Traditional Governance Fails
Most
governance models assume:
Agentic
AI violates all three.
You
cannot govern autonomy using checklists designed for assistance.
What Responsible Agentic AI Requires
Enterprises
must design:
Autonomy
without brakes is not innovation—it’s negligence.
2. Observability & Explainability
Leaders
must be able to answer:
- Why did the agent act?
- What alternatives did it
evaluate?
- What data influenced the
decision?
Without
this, trust collapses.
The
question is not:
“Should
humans be in the loop?”
The real
question is:
“At which
decisions, thresholds, and moments?”
Governance
must be architectural, not procedural.
The Leadership Imperative
Agentic
AI is not just a technology decision.
It is a risk, ethics, and accountability decision.
Boards
and CXOs can no longer delegate this conversation entirely to IT.
In Beyond
GenAI, I dedicate an entire section to governance failures, ethical risks,
and control frameworks for autonomous systems—because this is where most AI
strategies break down.
📘 https://www.amazon.in/dp/9364229363
👉 In the final part, we look forward—what
leaders must do now to prepare for an autonomous future.
No comments:
Post a Comment