The other major problem with the city is that a vast majority of “residents” of Delhi do no associate themselves with the city. There is no sense of belongingness and certainly no pride in being part of the city.
For someone, like me, who on an average spends (whenever in Delhi) up to 4-5 hours on the road per day, the state of the infrastructure, culture on road and the general disposition of “natives” borders towards insolence, impatience and just plain rudeness.
Recently Home Minister P. Chidambaram Tuesday told citizens of Delhi that they needed to change some of their bad habits if visitors to the Commonwealth Games next year are to have a good impression about the host city.
There are vehicles running without registration plates, some are crossing roads where they should not. People are not using over ground or underground passes and all in the name of saving a few steps of walking. I know that the weather is not very favorable at most times of the year in Delhi, but basic civic sense is a requirement and not a virtue. We should encourage people to change their mindset.
People come to Delhi. This is the capital and we cannot stop people. But if they come to Delhi, they themselves will have to adhere to the behavioral requirement. We must behave as a citizen of a big, good international city,’ Chidambaram said.
Easier said than done Mr. Minister!
Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit, whom I admire for all the work she has done for the city in the past decade, perhaps took the cue and said a campaign will soon be launched to make people in the national capital aware about the need for behavioral changes.
I wonder if this will make a huge impact. The most impressionable years in humans are the early childhood and we seem to have imparted a wrong message or no message at all during those years to people who come or reside in Delhi.
Some of the citizens are not amused, however. According to some newspaper reports - some people have (correctly) said that not just Delhi but the whole country needs a crash course in basic manners and politeness. some opine that the change should start from the government officers and politicians.
As a resident, and although this goes against political correctness, I have to fully agree. And it nowhere more evident than on the roads. The “Delhi culture” and I may be venturing into a political minefield by saying this, reflects upon our actions on the road. Not following the lane discipline, parking 6 feet away from where we want to shop (to avoid walking) and frequently blaring horns to ensure that everybody is aware that our vehicles have it, no matter how disturbing it might be to openly break rules of the road or even mere civility – all are characteristic of the denizens of this area called the NCR.
There is so much evidence of this basic lack of courtesy and manners. The other day, I was in CP with my wife, trying to obtain a seat for a couple in a popular restaurant serving south Indian cuisine. Like polite and cultured couple, we were waiting for our turn, when much to our chagrin, a south Indian family of four rushed past everyone and secured a table which had just been vacated! Everyone who was waiting was surprised and angered by this blatant display of lack of manners. Some of the foreign tourists who were standing in the queue got the wrong impression that this is perhaps the right way to doing things in India or more specifically Delhi and started rushing past everyone into the hotel floor – hunting for tables for themselves. The south Indian family who had just secured a table was grinning as if they had just won an Olympic medal. We left, much in disgust, from the restaurant and headed towards another one in the outer circle – reflecting upon how these rude denizens turn very polite and urbane the moment they step outside India. Perhaps the fines or the fear of a new country turns them “docile”. The fact remains, basic civic sense and a sense of what is proper is singularly lacking in most of the Indians. True, the whole country needs a course in basic manners.
This is the kind of civil disobedience which, I am sure, Gandhi never subscribed to.
Civil disobedience, by the way, is the active refusal to obey certain laws, demands and commands of a government, or of an occupying power, without resorting to physical violence. It is one of the primary tactics of nonviolent resistance. In its most nonviolent form (in India, known as ahimsa or Satyagraha) it could be said that it is compassion in the form of respectful disagreement.
The American author Henry David Thoreau pioneered the modern theory behind this practice in his 1849 essay Civil Disobedience, originally titled "Resistance to Civil Government". The driving idea behind the essay was that of self-reliance, and also how one is in morally good standing as long as one can "get off another man's back"; so one does not necessarily have to physically fight the government, but one must not support it or have it support one (if one is against it). This essay has had a wide influence on many later practitioners of civil disobedience. In the essay, Thoreau explained his reasons for having refused to pay taxes as an act of protest against slavery and against the Mexican-American War.
The intentions and in some cases actions of these “humans” is anything but non-violent. I admire homo-sapiens ability to follow through a good idea to the extreme no matter how much it hurts. Civil disobedience taken to extreme – with every man for himself and the rest be damned.
I use the term very carefully since to be called “people or human”, one has to qualify as at least as evolved as one of the primitive homo sapiens tribe and sometimes I really wonder if these so called “people or humans” are evolved at all. For some have managed to bypass the evolutionary stages and regressed into half-baboon and half-chimpanzee states (no offence to these species and I hope PETA and similar organizations do not take offense to this)
Most of the people in Delhi are indeed disobedient of the laws of the land and amongst the youngsters and a certain profile of people it is considered as an identity symbol. To be able to flout rules is considered as a form of bravery or style statement. Perhaps I am too mild, but I fail to see the connection between machismo and the ability to jump a red light or travel in the opposite lane when the traffic is stuck in the right one.
Delhiites will be given lessons in civic sense and etiquettes ahead of the Commonwealth Games here next year. The Delhi government is preparing to act on Home Minister P. Chidambaram’s advice to the citizens in the capital. The campaign to impart civic sense will be launched in two phases and culminate two months before the start of the Games in October 2010.
We do not react to the pollution of the Yamuna, the dumping of garbage, the scrawling on ancient monuments and the disrespect of women. It is high time to change and think of this city which is very dear to all of us,’ said Dikshit in a statement.
I certainly hope that this campaign succeeds at least for 10% of the population of Delhi. I am reminded of my own blog entry on the bad habits of Delhi - 15 Traffic Rules that Delhi Lives By...
In my next entry, I will be writing about the state of infrastructure in Delhi…
No comments:
Post a Comment